Stable enough for a work computer?

If you are new to Linux or new to Sabayon Linux and just not sure where to post, here ya go. Post without fear of being told to RTFM :-)

Moderator: Moderators

Re: Stable enough for a work computer?

Postby Fitzcarraldo » Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:58

quan2m wrote:Something that lingers that may bite you in certain work environments is the "Hidden ESSID" problem. Using updated SL 5.1K (updated via forklift DVD) neither WICD or NetworkManager are able to connect to WEP/LEAP or WPA1/2 PSK when the ESSID is hidden.

For the WPA1/2PSK (my home network) I was able to get them to connect by unhiding the ESSID and joining, and then hiding the network again. The WEP/LEAP network is no worky as I cannot unhide it. I have tried using iwconfig to set the ESSID pre-emptively but that didn't work either. It appears to error out after the authentication is complete so there may be another setting that I am not aware of (I'm not very savvy on the Linux wireless front.

A few weeks ago I studied the behaviour of NetworkManager with hidden WPA networks. Having found that NetworkManager 0.7.2 could not connect to my WPA network until I configured my router to broadcast the network name (SSID), I then configured my router to stop broadcasting the network name, i.e. I made the WPA network a hidden network again. I found that NetworkManager could then connect to the hidden WPA network.

If I understand correctly from the following exchange of posts with a NetworkManager developer, it seems this functionality is not a bug in NetworkManager; it is intentional: Cannot connect to wpa/wpa2 network with hidden SSID.

Dan Williams wrote:The supplicant isn't able to probe-scan to find your AP because it doesn't have the information yet to be able to do so. Once you've successfully connected, NM will cache the AP's BSSID and recognize that AP from the scan list and try to reconnect automatically. But the first time has to be manual, because otherwise there's no way to find the AP since it's trying to hide.

Hiding isn't actually a useful method of increasing security, since the AP's beacon and BSSID are always available in probe responses; so anyone can actually get the SSID irregardless of whether the AP is broadcasting that information in its beacon.


See also the following openSUSE thread about the same functionality: Cannot connect to a hidden SSID and the following SLED thread: Hidden Access Point: Cannot connect to wireless.

Finally, it seems that the functionality is the same in Windows Vista -- see the thread: Vista - Can't connect to router with hidden ssid.

So it looks like it is by design. I'm not sure I understand a post in each of the two above-mentioned SUSE threads, but it looks like there may be a parameter that you can set in one of the networking configuration files that lets you override this functionality and allow a PC -- if one knows the network name and password -- to connect to a hidden network that has never broadcast its network name. But I'm not sure yet: I need to do some more googling/reading.
User avatar
Fitzcarraldo
Sagely Hen
 
Posts: 7977
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 5:40
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Stable enough for a work computer?

Postby arjay » Fri Jan 01, 2010 17:10

wolfden wrote:Please keep in mind we run from the ~ branch of portage. ~ is not stable branch, it's testing branch. This is why we are a bleeding edge distro.


+1

But....kudos to the developers. I've never had a more stable experience in Sabayon or any of the Gentoo derivatives. I used to come into it expecting to have to do some aggressive maintenance on a routine basis and would therefore make sure I had enough time to do so. Any more, I'm surprised, especially in the entropy world, if anything more than a normal update is required. For me, it just works, and works well!
arjay
Simple Hen
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 22:03
Location: ~/earth

Re: Stable enough for a work computer?

Postby Delifisek » Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:47

Well I use for work. My main job is developing php pages.

I need. Kate, Kmail, Skype, firefox, dual desktop (with different res and ati card) and some firefox extensions.

All of them work flawlessly.

Last 2 years I had Kubuntu. After each relase I lost some of abilitys. (dual desktop, then firefox wont work some extensions)

Sabayon was much better. It fast and stable except that f*** pulseaudio. I remove it now I'm mosty happy. Except that network management thing always using default thing.

Regards
Delifisek
Baby Hen
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 21:48
Location: Turkey

Re: Stable enough for a work computer?

Postby arcusxl » Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:25

I have installed Sabayon 5.1 KDE and have the same problem. My home wifi network is hidden and not recognised. It's 100% a bug, using Ubuntu 09.10 I have no problems to connect, it simply asks for network name and passphrase. XP and Vista have no problems too.
arcusxl
Baby Hen
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:27

Previous

Return to Beginners|Newbies Area

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: richarddjames and 1 guest