Tuxbar

Compiz, KDE, Gnome, Fluxbox, etc...

Moderator: Moderators

Tuxbar

Postby chickpea » Wed Jul 25, 2007 16:48

Kinda not the "theme" of the week what with 3.4 out and all (installing tonight I CAN'T WAIT!!).

Anyway, I want to know if anyone has had any problems installing this SuperKaramba widget

http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.ph ... ntent=7126

It is an OSX scrollbar clone. I would love to get this rolling, but I don't necessarily need any eyecandy headaches right now, if you know what I mean.

Anyone know anything about this widget?
User avatar
chickpea
Sagely Hen
 
Posts: 1084
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 15:08
Location: Washington, DC

Postby zouzou85 » Wed Jul 25, 2007 20:49

superkaramba is installed in sabayon 3.4 by default. so you should have any probs with it.
for the osx bar clone, you might want to try something like:
kxdocker
avant-window-navigator
kiba-dock
gnome-dock
kool-dock
smooth-dock.

the one i like most is kxdocker, althought it is kinda old and and needs some tweaking.
to install kxdocker just do the following in console:
# layman -a xeffect

then,
emerge -1v kxdocker

then you should be albe to play around with it
Ignorance is not shameful. Arrogantly ignoring and denying your ignorance is.
All men are capable of learning, except two: The Arrogant and The Shy.
User avatar
zouzou85
Growing Hen
 
Posts: 104
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:12
Location: West Coast, North Africa, South America

Postby chickpea » Thu Jul 26, 2007 17:28

You are right about kxdocker, it's the best out of that bunch.

No need to add the xeffects overlay it's in portage:

http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?kxdocker-1.1.4a

Any reason why you would prefer kxdocker over Tuxbar?

Is SuperKaramba more resource intensive than Kxdocker? I would prefer, obviously to use as little system resources for this as possible.

Thanks

Bryan
User avatar
chickpea
Sagely Hen
 
Posts: 1084
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 15:08
Location: Washington, DC

Postby zouzou85 » Thu Jul 26, 2007 19:04

Usually, superkaramba is not what eats your resources but the widgets that you use trought karamba.
i prefer kxdocker over the tuxbar because it is more configurable. i remember when i used kxdocker in SL3.3loop2, the CPU would be at 12-18% range, which was fine for me. but the tuxbar would flunctuate too much. CPU goes from 10% up TO 80% then down to 40% then UP to 90%, so i just let it go.
it really depends on how your system works with it.

EDIT: just forgot to tell you that kxdocker needs beryl or compiz so it won't have the black background.
Ignorance is not shameful. Arrogantly ignoring and denying your ignorance is.
All men are capable of learning, except two: The Arrogant and The Shy.
User avatar
zouzou85
Growing Hen
 
Posts: 104
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:12
Location: West Coast, North Africa, South America

Postby chickpea » Thu Jul 26, 2007 19:49

Cool thanks. I have 3.4a installed, with compiz-fusion up and running so no problem. Looks like I am going to go with kxdocker. I don't need that kind of fluctuation in my system resources with a silly eye-candy thing.

Thanks
Bryan
User avatar
chickpea
Sagely Hen
 
Posts: 1084
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 15:08
Location: Washington, DC


Return to 3D Desktops and Window Managers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron