Kernel 3.3 and slow disk performance -reiserfs?

Discussion in general that pertains to Sabayon Linux - Must Pertain to Sabayon Linux

Moderator: Moderators

Kernel 3.3 and slow disk performance -reiserfs?

Postby BoeroBoy » Mon May 07, 2012 21:23

I recently upgraded to 3.3.0:
Code: Select all
Linux 3.3.0-sabayon #1 SMP x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) II X4 640 Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux


And booted to find horrible disk performance in KDE. Any attempt to open Dolphin or even browse for a file in a web browser took 20+ seconds. Most apps ran fine despite this. I know there are reports like this around, but I tried several suggestions (moving ~/.kde4, etc.) but the only thing that fixed my problem was to revert to 3.2. One particular detail is I use some ReiserFS, so that might have something to do with it.

Just a heads-up in case anybody else has this experience?
User avatar
BoeroBoy
Simple Hen
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 20:25

Re: Kernel 3.3 and slow disk performance -reiserfs?

Postby anomaly65 » Sun May 20, 2012 22:26

was that kernel update the only upgrade? tough to separate.....

I've found that throughout numerous kde upgrades, the nepomuk/strigi file system search "stuff" goes a bit bonkers. Solutions range from disabling them (my fav choice), or zeroing their databases and let them start over (they still will do a serious disk crawl upon first startup).

Still a big fan of the whole reiserfs underpinnings, and what he had in mind. Just had major bad choices in other places in his life :-(

I quit reiserfs when it/he became a jailed "chroot" filesystem (pun intended!). Now, I am an xfs fan due to it's long history, full toolsuite, and zero complaints if you have 200k files in a single directory, along with superior performance for large files, and no major penalties for small files. UFS, EXTx, and numerous others simply can't handle those situtations well. (my xfs filesystems range from 10G to 16Tbytes, with only one significant dataloss of about 10% after multiple underlying disks failed; lousy power and too many lightening spikes on the local power grid).

Thus, for many years, reiserfs was my primary choice, xfs has now been my mainstay in server (NAS, SAN & LVM), desktop, notebook and SSD without any hassle (but, very thin toolset and recovery support). Surprisingly, a very poor (my typo) raid device failure and recovery (dirty state that looked clean), the xfs tools performed admirably, and essentially, no underlying updates were required to support SSD's on one end, or massive SANs on the other. FWIW, EXT work just fine for 90% of desktop users, no doubt. I'll wait til 5.x kernel is out before I venture into btrfs again (just a needed, and good idea, but early upgrade to the EXTfs line....)

Just food for thought. I have a couple 5-8 year old but full production gentoo systems fully updated (headless....) with reiserfs 3.x filesystems running 3.3 kernel without any issues after years of the reiserfs filesystem, and thousands of hours of runtime. Thus, my thought that kde's file index might be your unwanted friend. reiser has always been super friendly and performance clean (compared to EXTx) for massive directories and directory crawling.

Hope those help. good luck!
andy
--
Use handrails on stairs. A nasty fall face first changes your point of view quickly, and mine permanently :-)
User avatar
anomaly65
Advanced Hen
 
Posts: 231
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 15:37


Return to Sabayon Linux General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests