Spritz removed? [Solved]

[_mic_]

Got it.

Thanks,
mic

[Fitzcarraldo]

Belatedly... Why the name change, anyway?

[carltonh]

Don't have he answer of "why the name change." But be prepared for jokes that "it stinks."

[wolfden]

Something like this:
Reason behind Sulfur: chemical names.
We have "entropy", "equo" as in "equilibrium", "reagent", "activator". Spritz was a bit anachronistic.

I'm not a chemist so don't ask me

[m4rk]

Just a small question, the second button on the left collumn that was the category view in Spritz, is now the "all" button in the top right in Sulfur? If so i think tha the design in Spritz for showing the packets categorised in two columns was better, but that's my opinion. And yes it's more responsive. Good work all in all.

[joost]

You can simply get the spritz looks again if you choose the advanced mode.

[m4rk]

You can simply get the spritz looks again if you choose the advanced mode.

Yes i did that, thank you joost, i just commented on the new look about the categorised view.

[joost]

ooh yes indeedly.

Well maybe it might be a nice addition to have the categories on the left and the packages on the right. Split view (by default?)

[lxnay]

I'm studying a modern solution at the moment. Something between package tagging and Mac/iPhone items navigation