I know that ideally you should stick to one package manager to minimize conflicts and system breakage. For most SL users, that would probably be Entropy. However, is there a best practice as to when to use Portage vs Entropy?
Based on what I'm reading in the forums and wiki, this is what I think. Basically I'm just looking for feedback from more exerpeinced users to know if my "method" of managing my system works.
Basically, I use Entropy for everything possible. For world updates, and every time I want to install a program I search Entropy first.
For Portage, I only use it if I need something that's not in Entropy. I never use Portage for system/world updates.
If there is an application already installed on my system, and a new version is released with bugfixes or features I want, I wait for that program to be installed in Entropy. If, after awhile, I noticed that the Entropy version isn't being updated (or the updated version is only in branch 5) but the updated version is in Portage, then I use Entropy to remove the software from my computer and I use Portage to reinstall the newer version.
Again, am I using the package managers in a recommended fashion or is there a better way of doing things?
