Moderator: Moderators
Fitzcarraldo wrote: would be a feature-for-feature comparison of Kuroo and Portato. What features does Portato have that Kuroo doesn't, and vice versa?
Make sure you are connected to the Internet
joost wrote:@juancarlospaco
You might be more interested in Sabayon PE.
juancarlospaco wrote:Fitzcarraldo wrote: would be a feature-for-feature comparison of Kuroo and Portato. What features does Portato have that Kuroo doesn't, and vice versa?
yesss...
Portato´s need more features, like History, progressbars, etc, etc, most users like them.

Fitzcarraldo wrote:wolfden wrote:Kuroo isn't developed any more, look at it's website.
Well, a new issue 0.81_rc1 was released on 31 August 2007 and a 'lite' version on 10 September 2007 so, to paraphrase Mark Twain, reports of its death have been greatly exaggerated. I have to say that I like Kuroo and use it a lot. Having read the dire warnings about Kuroo in the Forum, for several months after discovering SL I was too scared to use Kuroo to install packages, only using it to browse Portage and doing all my emerging via the command line. Then I thought I'd 'risk' giving Kuroo a try and was surprised to find it to be very usable, and have used it frequently since.
What would be useful -- perhaps from Necoro himself, as he knows his own package the best (and presumably the competition too, as no doubt he has studied them) -- would be a feature-for-feature comparison of Kuroo and Portato. What features does Portato have that Kuroo doesn't, and vice versa?
Return to Artwork and Development Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest